Legal Opinion

BNSF Railway Co. v. L.B. Foster Co.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided January 8, 2013No. 4:11CV3076PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WARREN K. URBOM, Senior District Judge.

The plaintiff, BNSF Railway Company (BNSF), filed a six-count amended complaint against the defendant, L.B. Foster Company (L.B. Foster), on August 5, 2011. (ECF No. 15.) Now before me is L.B. Foster’s motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 43.) For the following reasons, I find that L.B. Foster’s motion must be granted.

I. BACKGROUND1

BNSF is a Delaware corporation. (Def.’s Statement of Material Facts (Def.’s Facts) ¶ 11, ECF No. 45.) Though its principal place of business is located in Fort…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Craig Singletary v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. Haigh v. Gelita USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. Interstate Cleaning Corp. v. Commercial Underwriters Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yanise Germain v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Sigler v. Ecolab Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API