Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Fuller Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1986No. 86-1366PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAGG, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s judgment dismissing their product liability lawsuits on the ground the actions are barred by the applicable Nebraska statute of repose. See Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-224(2) (Cum. Supp.1984). We affirm.

In 1984 plaintiffs suffered hearing losses which they claim were the result of operating rotary air compressors in a confined area below the deck of a barge owned by their employer. The compressors were supplied and installed and the barge first sold for use in 1967. Plaintiffs in 1985 sued the manufacturer of the compressors, Fuller Company…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. Town of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  2. Marjorie Louise Dabney v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated, and Honeywell, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. Colton v. DeweyNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Colleen Givens v. A.H. Robins Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  5. MacMillen v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spilker v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Gillam v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Nesladek v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
  4. Farber v. Lok-N-Logs, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Brown v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API