Legal Opinion
MacMillen v. AH Robins Co., Inc.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided May 11, 1984No. 83-383PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*339Boslaugh, J.
This is an appeal in a products liability action brought by Maureen MacMillen against A. H. Robins Company, Inc. (Robins), the manufacturer of an intrauterine contraceptive device known as a “Daikon Shield.” The trial court sustained the defendant’s demurrer and dismissed the amended petition. The plaintiff appeals.
The amended petition alleged that the Daikon Shield, which was designed for permanent implantation into the uterus by a physician to prevent conception, was unsafe for its intended use. The plaintiff alleged that in March of 1971 she was implanted with a Daikon Shield…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erbe v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Colton v. DeweyNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- Erbe v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Dupuis v. Van NattenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Stacey v. PantanoNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Berry by and Through Berry v. Beech AircraftUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Colleen Givens v. A.H. Robins Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Olson v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- L.R. Foy Construction Co. v. South Dakota State Cement Plant CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Givens v. Anchor Packing, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.