Legal Opinion

Bruton v. Gerber Products Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 6, 2013No. Case No.: 12-CV-02412-LHKPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART AND DENYING-IN-PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Natalia Bruton (“Bruton”) brings this putative class action against Gerber Products Company (“Gerber”) and Nestlé U.S.A., Inc. (“Nestlé U.S.A.”) (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging that Defendants violated federal and state law by making false and misleading claims on their food labels. Defendants move to dismiss Bruton’s First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 28; Bruton opposes, ECF No. 34, and Defendants replied, ECF No. 36. Having considered the submissions of the…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dzielak v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
  2. Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  3. Ham v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. Gustavson v. Wrigley Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
  5. Sciortino v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API