Legal Opinion
Gustavson v. Wrigley Sales Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 16, 2013No. Case No.: 12-CV-01861-LHKPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Phyllis Gustavson (“Gustav-son”) brings this putative class action against Defendants Wrigley Sales Company and Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company, Mars, Inc., and Mars Chocolate North America, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging that Defendants’ package labeling is “mis*1108branded” because it is unlawful and misleading under federal and state law. Defendants move to dismiss Gustavson’s First Amended Complaint, ECF Nos. 27, 29; Gustavson opposes, ECF Nos. 39, 41, and Defendants…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In re Yahoo Mail LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Casey v. Odwalla, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Zeiger v. Wellpet LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Sciortino v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Allen v. Hyland's Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.