Legal Opinion
Dzielak v. Whirlpool Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 16, 2014No. Civ. No. 2:12-0089(KM)PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEVIN McNULTY, District Judge:
This matter comes to the Court on Defendants’ motions (Docket Nos. 37 and 38), *314pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 12(b)(6), to dismiss the First Amended Consolidated Complaint (“FAC,” Docket No. 29) in this putative class action. For the reasons set forth below, the motions to dismiss will be granted in part and denied in part. These dismissals are without prejudice to the filing of a Second Amended Complaint.
The named plaintiffs, purchasers of Maytag washing machines, are Charlene Dzielak, Francis Angelone, Shelley Baker, Brian Maxwell, Jeffrey McLenna, Jeffery…
2Cases cited95 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Mladenov v. Wegmans Food Markets, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Schechner v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Volin v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- In re Azek Building Products, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Peruto v. Timbertech Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.