Legal Opinion
Ham v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 3, 2014No. Case No. 14-cv-02044-WHOPublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING PARTIES’ REQUESTS FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
Re: Dkt. Nos. 25, 29
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Hain Celestial Group Inc. manufactures Earth’s Best Organic Mini Waffles (the “Waffles”), which are identified as “All Natural” on their labels. Plaintiff Ana Belen Ham alleges that the Waffles are not, in fact, “All Natural” because they contain sodium acid pyrophosp-hate (“SAPP”), a synthetic substance, and sued Hain for violations of California consumer protection laws, fraud, breach of contract,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Williams v. Gerber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Whitaker v. Herr Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Frenzel v. AliphcomDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1776 v. Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Alexa Parashos v. Once Upon A FarmDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Brown v. Madison Reed, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.