Legal Opinion
Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 12, 2015No. Case No. CV 14-03305 MMM (CWx)PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ . . MOTION . TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST. AMENDED COMPLAINT-
MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.
On April 29, 2014, Terry T. Gerritsen filed this action against Katja Motion Pic*1110ture Corporation (“Katja”), New Line Productions, Inc. (“New Line”), and Warner Brothers Entertainment, Inc. (“WB”) (collectively, “defendants”).1 On June 20, 2014, defendants filed a motion to dismiss Gerritsen’s complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.2 The court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss with leave to amend on January 30, 2015.3 Gerritsen filed a…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Corcoran v. CVS Health Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Johnson v. Serenity Transportation, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Crowder v. Wilbur (In re Wilbur)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
- Prompt Staffing, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2018
- (PC) Garone v. MenciasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.