Legal Opinion
Kelley v. Tomas
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 9, 2001No. AC 19934PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The present appeal involves a boundary dispute between two adjacent landowners. The plaintiff, Joseph Kelley, appeals from the judgment, rendered after a trial to the court, in this action to quiet title to certain real property at 230-232 Main Street, Norwalk. The court found that the defendants, Joseph Tomas and Mary J. Tomas, have an easement over that property.
On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) failed to find that he is the fee simple owner of the subject property, (2) allowed certain stairs to continue to encroach on his property, (3) granted an…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- L. F. Pace & Sons, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Boccanfuso v. ConnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Beneduci v. ValadaresConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Willamette Management Associates, Inc. v. PalczynskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Sanders v. DiasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Segreto v. City of BristolConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.