Legal Opinion

Westinghouse Air Brake Co. Appeal

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1949No. Appeal, 163PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion ry

Reno, J.,

Arbitrators selected under a written collective bargaining agreement between The Westinghouse Air Brake Company, hereafter called Westinghouse, and United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, Local No. 610, hereafter called the Union, found for the latter. Contending only that “the arbitrators exceeded their powers”, within the meaning of the Act of April 25, 1927, P. L. 381, §10 (d), 5 PS §170, Westinghouse obtained a rule to show cause why the award should not be vacated. After argument the court below discharged the rule, and Westinghouse appealed.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. Int. L. G. W. U.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Goldstein v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Patriotic Order Sons of America Hall Ass'n v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Britex Waste Co. v. Nathan Schwab & Sons, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Rosenbaum v. DruckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. FioravantiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Great American Insurance v. American Arbitration Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Chervenak, Keane & Co. v. Hotel Rittenhouse Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Colt's Industrial Union v. Colt's Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  5. Coleman Co. v. International UnionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API