Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Int. L. G. W. U.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 8, 1937PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In the waist and dress industry in Philadelphia collective bargaining agreements have resulted in industrial peace and the maintenance of harmonious relations between employers and employees for several years. The present case does not involve the determination of any substantive rights of the parties to such agreements. As the record is here presented the only question is in regard to the proper procedural method of effecting their enforcement.
Appellees, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union and the Joint Board of Waist and Dress Makers' Union of Philadelphia, affiliated with the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Finsilver, Still & Moss, Inc. v. Goldberg, Maas & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Isaac v. Donegal & Conoy Mutual Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Bashford v. West Miami Land Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Pierce Steel Pile Corp. v. FlannerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Gowen v. PiersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Flightways Corp. v. Keystone Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Tp. of Moon v. POL. OFFICE. OF TP. OF MOONSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Cournoyer v. American Television & Radio Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Allstate Insurance v. McMonagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.