Legal Opinion

Britex Waste Co. v. Nathan Schwab & Sons, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 19, 1939No. Appeal, 371PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Cunningham, J.,

Plaintiff, an English corporation, brought the present suit in assumpsit against defendant in the Municipal Court of Philadelphia County. The action was based upon an award of arbitrators in London purporting to have been made pursuant to a provision in written contracts for the sale by plaintiff and purchase by defendant of certain bales of cotton waste. Defendant filed an affidavit of defense. Plaintiff now appeals from an order of the court below discharging its rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

Plaintiff’s statement set forth two…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. BurnstineNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Goldstein v. Int. L. G. W. U.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Goldstein v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Nippon Ki-Ito Kaisha, Ltd. v. Ewing-Thomas Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. HockingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. White v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. American Leasing v. Morrison Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Castle v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  5. Moyer v. Van-Dye-Way CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API