Legal Opinion

Patriotic Order Sons of America Hall Ass'n v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1931No. Appeal, 27PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

This is an action of assumpsit on a policy of fire insurance. The fundamental question to be determined is the meaning of the terms “actual cash value” and “sound value.” The trial judge held their meaning to be the same; the plaintiff, appellant, contends it is different.

The policy provides: “In consideration of the reduced rate and (or) form under which this policy is written, it is expressly stipulated and made a portion of this contract that in the event of loss this company shall be liable for no greater proportion thereof than the amount hereby insured…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Fedas v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Continental Ins. v. GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
  3. Hostetter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  4. Isaac v. Donegal & Conoy Mutual Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Pittsburg Construction Co. v. West Side Belt RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Emporium Area Joint School Authority v. Anundson Construction & Building Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. J. Purdy Cope Hotels Co. v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Turner Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Tyler v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  5. Schreiber v. Pacific Coast Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API