Legal Opinion

Rosenbaum v. Drucker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1943No. Appeal, 253PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

We do not propose to dignify this regrettable Church controversy by an elaborate discussion. Had the contending factions accepted and carried out, in good faith, the initial conclusions and directions of the arbitrators of their own selection, this litigation would have been avoided. The arbitrators made a wise and constructive adjudication of the whole controversy. Because the parties failed to abide by, and follow such directions, the present bill in equity was filed and issue joined. This returned the controversy to its original status. Once again, by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Canuso v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Isaac v. Donegal & Conoy Mutual Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Curran v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Sukonik v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Bartholomew v. Lehigh Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. White v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Giant Markets, Inc. v. Sigma Marketing Systems, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. JA Robbins Co., Inc. v. Airportels, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Wark & Co. v. Twelfth & Sansom Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API