Legal Opinion
Souper Spud, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 10, 1985No. 3177PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment rendered for the defendant in accordance with a directed verdict as to one portion of the plaintiffs revised complaint, and from a judgment rendered following a jury verdict as to the remainder of the revised complaint.
Between November 3 and November 4,1981, a restaurant owned and operated by the plaintiff was virtually destroyed by fire. The plaintiff sought to recover on a multiperil insurance policy issued by the defendant which covered losses resulting from fire or other casualties. The defendant refused to pay the plaintiff, claiming, among…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Batick v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Sestito v. City of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Rossignol v. Danbury School of Aeronautics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Puro v. HenrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Lone Star Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Verrastro v. Middlesex InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Travelers Insurance v. NamerowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Souper Spud, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Travelers Insurance v. NamerowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.