Legal Opinion
Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. Pearson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 29, 1952PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.
The judgment from which this appeal was taken enjoined the defendant from further *189litigating the matters which had been in controversy between the parties for many years. The ultimate question is whether the court erred in concluding that the plaintiff was entitled to that relief.
Inasmuch as the defendant has not brought up the evidence, her attacks upon the finding of subordinate facts are futile. The material subordinate facts found are the following: The plaintiff is a corporation supplying water to the public. It has the right, under the power of eminent domain, to take the property it…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Souffront v. La Compagnie Des Sucreries De Porto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- New Orleans v. Gaines's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Veits v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Antman v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Norton v. Shore Line Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Alarm Applications Co. v. Simsbury Volunteer Fire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- QSP, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Giglio v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Hayes v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.