Legal Opinion
Travelers Insurance v. Namerow
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 22, 2002No. SC 16375PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The defendants, Robert Namerow and Barbara Namerow, appealed from the judgments of the trial court for the plaintiff, Travelers Insurance Company, rendered after a jury trial, in this consolidated action to determine the liability of the parties pursuant to a homeowners insurance policy.1 The defendants con*786tended that the trial court improperly: (1) failed to instruct the jury on the elements of the civil arson defense; and (2) abused its discretion by admitting into evidence a document that the defendants claimed did not meet the requirements of the business records exception…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Cahill v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Hertz Corp. v. Federal InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Tedesco v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Security Insurance v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Allstate Insurance v. BarronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Dilieto v. County Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Embalmers' Supply Co. v. GiannittiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Benedetto v. WanatConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.