Legal Opinion
Travelers Insurance v. Namerow
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 4, 2001No. SC 16375PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The defendants, Robert Namerow and Barbara Namerow, appeal from the judgments for the plaintiff, Travelers Insurance Company, rendered after a jury trial in this consolidated action to determine the liability of the parties pursuant to a homeowner’s insurance policy.1 The defendants contend that the trial court improperly: (1) failed to instruct the jury on the elements of the civil arson defense; and (2) abused its discretion by admitting into evidence a document that the defendants claim does not meet the requirements of the business records exception to the hearsay…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Connecticut National Bank v. VoogSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Konover Development Corp. v. ZellerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. GantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Friezo v. FriezoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Dilieto v. County Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Middlesex Insurance v. MaraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Travelers Insurance v. NamerowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.