Legal Opinion

Apgar v. Lederle Laboratories

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 28, 1991PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff claims that in 1963 and 1964 she ingested certain drugs manufactured and distributed by defendants, and that because those drugs were defective, they produced discoloration in her adult teeth. She started this products-liability action in 1988. After discovery, defendants moved for summary judgment based on the statute of limitations, N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2 and -21. Plaintiff relied on our “discovery rule,” arguing that she did not know, and could not reasonably have known, that she had a cause of action against these defendants until some time within two years before she filed her…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HardisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Burd v. New Jersey Telephone CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  4. Vispisiano v. Ashland Chemical Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. Viviano v. CBS, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Gantes v. Kason Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Caravaggio v. D'AGOSTINISupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  3. Martinez v. Cooper Hospital-University Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  4. Savage v. Old Bridge-Sayreville Medical GroupSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. Staub v. Eastman Kodak Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API