Legal Opinion

Abboud v. Viscomi

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 29, 1988PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

STEIN, J.

The sole question before us is whether plaintiffs dental malpractice complaint was correctly dismissed by the trial court as barred by the two-year statute of limitations. After a hearing conducted pursuant to our decision in Lopez v. Swyer, 62 N.J. 267 (1973), the court found that plaintiff was aware that defendant had “done something wrong” in extracting her wisdom tooth more than two years prior to her commencing this action, and therefore dismissed her complaint. The Appellate Division affirmed, concluding that the record supported the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Burd v. New Jersey Telephone CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. Vispisiano v. Ashland Chemical Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. Lynch v. RubackySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. Silverman v. LathropNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  2. Roa v. RoaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  3. Caravaggio v. D'AGOSTINISupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  4. Cafferata v. PeyserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  5. Martinez v. Cooper Hospital-University Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API