Legal Opinion

Autenreith v. Norville

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1981No. 15002-PRPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Vice Chief Justice.

Appellants, Lawrence and Mary Lou Au-tenreith, filed an action in superior court to rescind a contract they had entered into with appellees, Allan and Alfena Norville. The Norvilles counterclaimed for the balance due under the contract. After a jury trial, a verdict was returned for the Nor- villes on their counterclaim. Judgment was entered, and the Autenreiths appealed. The Norvilles filed a cross-appeal. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the superior court. In addition the Court of Appeals awarded the Norvilles $21,646.00 as reasonable attorney’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Title Insurance Co. of Minnesota v. Acumen Trading Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Kostolansky v. LesherArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Decker v. RamenofskyArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Autenreith v. NorvilleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Amex Distributing Co., Inc. v. MascariCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. Wistuber v. Paradise Valley Unified School DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Lacer v. Navajo CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API