Legal Opinion
New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. State
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 1985No. 17581-PRPublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Justice.
Plaintiff-petitioner, New Pueblo Constructors (NPC), entered into two contracts with defendant-respondent, the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), to construct two adjoining segments of the interstate highway between Nogales and Tucson, known as the “Carmen” and “Tubac” projects. In the fall of 1977 and the spring of 1978, a catastrophic storm and unusually heavy rainfall caused extensive damage to both project areas and to work previously performed by NPC. NPC requested compensation for the additional costs in completing the work under a clause in both contracts that…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- WRB Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Electronic and Missile Facilities, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Foster Construction C. A. And Williams Brothers Company, a Joint Venture, Etc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Specialty Assembling & Packing Co., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- K & K RECYCLING, INC. v. Alaska Gold Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Kadish v. Arizona State Land DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Seattle Western Industries, Inc. v. David A. Mowat Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.