Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
This case presents the question whether a consequential damages limitation justified summary judgment for defendant-seller when the limited remedy of repair and replacement allegedly failed of its essential purpose. We hold that it did not and remand for trial.
FACTS:
Milgard Manufacturing, Inc. cuts and installs glass for use in residential and commercial construction. In 1979, it negotiated a contract with Selas Corporation of America to purchase a sophisticated glass tempering furnace. With Selas’ consent, this contract was assigned to plaintiff, Mil-gard…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Burger King Corp. v. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Faythe S. Takahashi and Hideo H. Takahashi v. Loomis Armored Car Service, and Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- S. M. Wilson & Company v. Smith International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Bank of California, N. A. v. W. H. Opie, California Union Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- American Nursery Products, Inc. v. Indian Wells OrchardsWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- AMX Enterprises, L.L.P. v. Master Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Christian Gospel Church, Inc. v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Ritchie Enterprises v. Honeywell Bull, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.