Rogus v. Lords
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Judge.
The sole issue we address in this appeal is whether appellants presented sufficient evidence of a contractual relationship between themselves and appellees arising out of their mutual membership on a board of realtors that would entitle appellants to damages against appellees for breach of contract.
FACTS
We review the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the judgment. Klensin v. City of Tucson, 10 Ariz.App. 399, 401, 459 P.2d 316, 318 (1969).
At all relevant times, all of the parties were licensed real estate salespersons or brokers, and all were members of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schade v. DiethrichArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Savoca Masonry Co., Inc. v. Homes & Son Const. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Pyeatte v. PyeatteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Lacer v. Navajo CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Rowland v. Union Hills Country ClubCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Orfaly v. Tucson Symphony SocietyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Rhue v. DawsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- A.R. Teeters & Associates, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Hale v. Amphitheater School District No. 10Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Longnecker v. American Express Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 2014
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.