Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Grand Trunk-Milwaukee Car Ferry Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1918No. Docket No. 48PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Thomas Thornton presented his claim for compensation against the Grand Trunk-Milwaukee Car Ferry Company for injuries received in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation, defendant brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

While plaintiff was engaged in his work as a “coal passer” on the car ferry “Milwaukee” he *610was struck in the eye by a piece of flying coal, resulting in an injury thereto, which later made it necessary to remove it. He filed his claim with the industrial accident board, and an award was made by the committee of arbitration, and afterwards approved and confirmed by the board.

From the stipulation of facts it appears:(1) That defendant is a Wisconsin corporation, and filed its written acceptance of the Michigan compensation act on September 12, 1912.(2) That defendant owns and operates the car…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Hall v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Neff v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Bedier v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Carey v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leszczymski v. Andrew Radel Oyster Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Bell v. Southern Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Foppen v. Peter J. Fase & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State Ex Rel. Cleveland Engineering Construction Co. v. DuffyOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Lee v. Licking Valley Coal Digger CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API