Legal Opinion

Bedier v. Fuller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Assumpsit by Josephine Bedier against Jay Fuller, Hiram D. Willmarth, and Dennis J. Reaume for money had and received. From a judgment for defendants on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This cause was commenced by attachment. The declaration is in assumpsit. It contains all the common counts, and, in addition thereto, a special count. A demurrer was interposed to the special count, and was sustained, and was afterwards affirmed in this court'. To the other counts, the plea of general issue was interposed, *127with a notice that the matters declared upon were res judicata. The attorney for the plaintiff made an opening statement of what he expected to prove. Upon the conclusion of his statement,, upon motion of defendants, the court directed a verdict in favor of defendants.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bedier v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Bedier v. ReaumeMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. FosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. C. H. Little Co. v. L. P. Hazen Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Hallett v. GordonMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Thornton v. Grand Trunk-Milwaukee Car Ferry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Anderson Carriage Co. v. PungsMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API