Legal Opinion

Hall v. Perry

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1888PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Marquette. (Grant, J.) Ejectment. Defendant brings error. The-facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This is an action of ejectment, brought' by the plaintiffs against the defendant, in the circuit court, for Marquette county, and, under the charge of the court,, verdict and judgment were entered for plaintiffs. Defendant brings the case into this Court by writ of error.

The facts are all agreed upon, and are as follows:

*203The plaintiffs now hold the original title to the land in question in this case by virtue of patents procured by their grantors. The defendant holds tax deeds covering the land in question for the taxes of 1882 and 1883, for taxes duly assessed thereon under the provisions of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. BrackettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Thomas v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Humphrey v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Davenport v. AplinMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Nester v. BuschMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. CooperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Board of Revenue of Jefferson County v. HewittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Union Pac. R. Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Weld County, Colo.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  4. Horton v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Norris v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API