Legal Opinion

Carey v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1918No. Docket No. 154PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Certiorari to. Industrial Accident Board. Anna, Carey presented her claim for compensation against the Grand Trunk Western Railway Company for the accidental death of her husband in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation, defendant brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This case is before this court upon certiorari to the industrial accident board. The record contains the proceedings had before the committee oh *13arbitration, and an appeal from its decision to the industrial accident board.

The defendant and appellant is a common carrier railroad corporation, engaged in the business of intrastate and interstate commerce in this State and elsewhere. On July 11, 1916, Timothy J. Carey, while in the service of said railway company as conductor of a freight train, composed exclusively of cars containing interstate shipments, consisting of freight from Chicago and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Erie Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Holmberg v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Waters v. GuileCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  5. Fernette v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nichols v. WatersMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Thornton v. Grand Trunk-Milwaukee Car Ferry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Miller v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Sterner v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. McKenna v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API