Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Cleveland Engineering Construction Co. v. Duffy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1925No. 18896PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is an original action in mandamus in which the plaintiff asks that the defendant, the Industrial Commission of Ohio, accept premiums from it, payable into the state insurance fund under the Workmen’s Compensation Act for the benefit of its employes, who are employed “on floating vessels in navigable waters.” These men are divisible into eight classes:(1) Men on floating dredges. Employed in dredging for foundations for docks, cribs, and bridges, dredging trenches for installing pipes of brick, concrete, or metal, for water, sewer, or gas, for making, widening, and deepening channels,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Western Fuel Co. v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Insurance Co. v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Emmons v. Pacific Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State Ex Rel. Cleveland Engineering Construction Co. v. DuffyOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Tyler v. Indust. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API