Legal Opinion

Brydle v. Honigbaum

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 17, 1931No. Patent Appeal 2750Published

1Opinion of the Court

54 F.2d 147 (1931)

BRYDLE

v.

HONIGBAUM.

Patent Appeal No. 2750.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

December 17, 1931.

Charles M. Thomas and Francis D. Thomas, both of Washington, D. C. (Arlon V. Cushman, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

Cornelius Zabriskie, of New York City, for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.

In Brydle v. Honigbaum, 49 F.(2d) 963, 18 C. C. P. A. 1517, an opinion was filed in this case and an order entered reversing the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Townsend v. SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  2. Miller v. HaymanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  3. Janette v. FoldsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  4. Brydle v. HonigbaumCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  5. Harlan v. BregmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API