Legal Opinion
Crosby v. Wynkoop
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 1910No. 8206PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered January 5, 1909, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, for $1,000, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, C. J.
This action was instituted to recover damages for a breach of the following contract of sale:
“Received from Frank L. Crosby the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100), as earnest money, and part payment for the following described premises, situate in the county of Pierce, state of Washington to wit: The Southeast quarter (SE14) of the Northeast quarter (NE%), and the South half (S%) *476of the Northeast quarter (NE14) of the Northeast quarter (NE14) °f Section Twenty-two (22) in Township Twenty-one (21) North of Range three (8) East of the Willamette Meridian, containing (60) acres of land this day…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morgan v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Howe v. CoatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Smith v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- George v. ConhaimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Babcock, Cornish & Co. v. UrquhartWashington Supreme Court · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ogooshevitz v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Colpe v. LindblomWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Scott v. StanleyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Story v. MontfortonMontana Supreme Court · 1941
- Ellwood v. NiedermeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.