Babcock, Cornish & Co. v. Urquhart
Washington Supreme Court
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, A. Q. Kellam, Esq., judge pro tempore, ■entered April 17, 1908, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury,' in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
By this action plaintiff seeks to recover damages from defendants on account of their failure to convey title to certain land and water rights, in compliance with a contract of purchase between the parties. A jury being waived, trial was had before the court, resulting in findings -and judgment against the defendants for the amount paid by *170plaintiff upon the purchase price, and an attorney’s fee paid by it for examination of title, with interest. Both parties have appealed, defendants contending that plaintiff is not entitled to any recovery, and plaintiff contending that it is entitled to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Robb v. VosSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Conrow v. . LittleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Connihan v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Ludington v. PattonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Thompson v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Holland Texas Hypotheek Bank v. BroocksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Roy v. VaughanWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Empey v. Northwestern & Pacific HypotheekbankWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- North Pacific Public Service Co. v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1936
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.