Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Bell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1892No. 220PublishedCited by 66 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court Jefferson County. Action by James Morgan and others against William Bell to enforce a contract for the conveyance of certain lands in Clallam county, State of Washington, or for damages for failure to convey. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

A correct understanding of this case will necessitate a presentation of the material allegations in the pleadings. The first allegation in the complaint is—

“ That on the 10th day of December, 1889, the plaintiffs and defendants entered into an agreement in writing of which the following is a copy: ‘ Contract made and entered into this 10th day of December, 1889, by and between William Bell, of Toledo, Ohio, and James Morgan, of Port Townsend, Jefferson county, Washington: Witnesseth: The said William Bell, being the owner in fee simple of the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Hopkins v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. Bank of the United States v. DANIELSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  4. Woodcock v. BennetNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  5. Pumpelly v. . PhelpsNew York Court of Appeals · 1869

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Ormsby v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Ward v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Rauen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Silver Surprize, Inc. v. Sunshine Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Atlantic Seaboard Natural Gas Co. v. WhittenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API