Legal Opinion
Colpe v. Lindblom
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 1910No. 8110PublishedCited by 21 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gay, J., entered January 25, 1909, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
On January 31, 1907, the appellants entered into a written contract with the respondents in the words following, omitting signatures and acknowledgment:
“Real Estate Contract.
“San Francisco, January 31, 1907.
“Received from Herbert V. Perry and Chas. H. Colpe the sum of five thousand ($5,000) dollars as deposit for the purchase by them from us of the Washington Block, situated on First Avenue, Seattle, King County, Washington, legally described as follows:
“The purchase price of said property to be two hundred *108fifteen thousand ($215,000) dollars, net to us, payable by purchasers as follows:…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sanford v. Royal InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Hartley v. . JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Ankeny v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1889
- Brookman v. DurkeeWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Carter v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hebb v. SeversonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Schaefer v. E. F. Gregory Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Pacific States Cut Stone Co. v. GobleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Douglas v. DouglasIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.