Legal Opinion

Chin & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 16, 1921No. 2093PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Presiding Judge

This appeal concerns the due classification for dutiable purposes of certain Chinese shoes imported at the port of San Francisco. Those, the classification of which is by the limitations of this record in controversy, are by the record stipulated to be “composed of leather and cotton and some vegetable'fiber other than cotton, and that the combined values of the cotton and other vegetable fiber exceeds the value of the leather, but that the leather exceeds in *125value any other single component.” They were.classified for dutiable purposes by the collector of customs at the aforesaid port under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Steinhardt & Bro. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. United States v. GavinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. Steinhardt & Bro. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Swiss Manufactures Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Kaplan Products & Textiles, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. United States v. PerezCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API