Legal Opinion
Eidlitz & Son Inc. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 24, 1924No. 2254PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hateíeld, Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of the court:
The importation the subject of this appeal consisted of chimes composed of ten bells and the necessary operating mechanism. The bells were arranged so that the chimes could be played by hand by means of a keyboard.' They ‘did not strike the hour, but wefe designed for the purpose of playing certain old music. They were installed 'in the tower of a building known as' darkness Memorial Quadrangle at Yale University. The chimes and the building in which they were installed were a gift to the university by the Harkness family. " ' . -
*58The chimes…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Borgfeldt & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
- First Unitarian Soc. of Chicago v. FaulknerSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Chickasha Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Union Guaranty & Trust Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- United States v. Borgfeldt & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Atlanta University v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Cintes v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Joseph Poli Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- Joseph Poli Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- Otto Schmidt Wine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.