Legal Opinion

Battles v. Childers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 6, 1936No. 27334PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH,, J.

Plaintiff, legally appointed, qualified, and acting member of the Conservation Commission of the State of Oklahoma, seeks a writ of mandamus requiring the State Auditor and State Treasurer to allow and pay his claim as salary as such commissioner for the month of July, 1936.

There is no controversy as to any of the facts. It is conceded that the plaintiff is such member of said commission. That such commission was created by the 15th Legislature by House Bill No. 84, being article 3 of chapter 70, S. L. 1935'; that by said act the salary was fixed at $4,000 per year, payable monthly;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edwards v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. State Ex Rel. Telle v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Phelps v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Rountree v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Board of Com'rs of Caddo County v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Jurd v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API