Legal Opinion

Phelps v. Childers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1939No. 28853PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an original action filed by the plaintiffs, Justices of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma, elected to such office on November 6, 1934, seeking to compel, by mandamus, the defendant C.C. Childers, State Auditor, and Hubert Bolen, State Treasurer, to approve and pay their several claims for services performed in compliance with the provisions of House Bill 239, Session Laws 1936-37, page 33, which became effective August 10, 1937. Since the filing of this action Frank Carter has become State Auditor and Carl Sebring State Treasurer. On motion they have been substituted as defendants.

The…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Coyle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Commonwealth v. MoirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. Hooker, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. United States v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Sheldon v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Macy v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Powers v. DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  3. Palmer Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Bond v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  5. State Ex Rel. Edmondson v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API