Legal Opinion
Board of Com'rs of Caddo County v. Lawrence
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 15, 1938No. 27739PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This action was commenced in the district court of Caddo county by R. L. Lawrence against the county to recover for the alleged unpaid portion of his salary earned by him as county judge. Judgment for the plaintiff below was rendered on the pleadings, and defendant has appealed. The parties will be referred to in the order of their appearance at the trial.
The allegations of the petition are that the plaintiff as county judge was entitled to a salary of $3,000 per annum as provided by section 7833, O. S. 1931, Laws 1910 II, c. 68. sec. 1; that during the fiscal year 1932-1933, although…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eaton v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Protest of Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Smith v. Minneapolis Threshing MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Board of Com'rs of Okmulgee County v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Young v. Town of MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Del City v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 114Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Jurd v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES INC. v. BD. OF COUNTY COMM'RS OF OKLA. COUNTYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES INC. v. BD. OF COUNTY COMM'RS OF OKLA. COUNTYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES INC. v. BD. OF COUNTY COMM'RS OF OKLA. COUNTYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.