Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Carter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 30, 1934No. 25073PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an original proceeding in this court in which the petitioners pray for a writ of mandamus requiring the State Auditor to allow their salary claims in the sum of $625 each month, and requiring the State Treasurer to pay said warrants or indorse thereon proper notation, as by law provided, for the allowance of interest.

The allegations of the petitioners are that at the time of their election to office the salary provided by law for each of their offices was $7,500 per annum, payable monthly, and that the State Auditor has refused to allow their claims for salaries in an amount greater…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. O'Donoghue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Carr v. State ex rel. CoetlosquetIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Thomas v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  5. Riley v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Phelps v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Wells v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Rountree v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. State Ex Rel. Telle v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Carter v. MileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API