Legal Opinion

Rountree v. Phelps

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 15, 1948No. 33264PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

Original proceeding in mandamus by the above-named plaintiffs to compel Roger Phelps, State Budget Director, to allow certain claims presented to him by plaintiffs and to compel A. S. J. Shaw, State Auditor, to issue his warrants upon such approved claims and to compel John Conner, State Treasurer, to pay said warrants when presented from the proper fund in the State Treasury.

It is alleged in plaintiffs’ petition that they are the duly appointed, qualified, and acting members of the State Board of Health during the time covered by their claims here involved; that the defendant officers are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Riley v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Edwards v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. State Ex Rel. Telle v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Battles v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Application of Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Auth.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Johnston v. ConnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Johnston v. ConnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Morgan v. DaxonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  5. Morgan v. DaxonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API