Legal Opinion
United States v. Taylor
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided September 30, 1997No. 96-1241; Crim.App. No. 31574PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
GIERKE, Judge:
At a general court-martial composed of officers at Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, appellant was arraigned on charges of forcible sodomy, assault and battery, indecent assault, and committing indecent acts, in violation of Articles 125, 128, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 925, 928, and 934, respectively. Appellant pleaded guilty to consensual sodomy but not guilty to forcible sodomy, and not guilty to the remaining offenses. The military judge dismissed the assault-and-battery and indecent-assault charges as multiplieious.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- Graves v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. St. Michael's Credit Union and Janice SacharczykCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. SuzukiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. AkbarCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. EversoleCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. WeatherspoonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.