Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided August 31, 2000No. 00-5002/CGPublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge GIERKE

delivered the opinion of the Court.

A general court-martial composed of officer members convicted appellee, on mixed pleas, of larceny (4 specifications), forgery (26 specifications), violating a general order (5 specifications), dereliction of duty (6 specifications), making a false official statement, filing a false claim against the United States, and communicating indecent language, in violation of Articles 121, 123, 92, 107, 132, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 921, 923, 892, 907, 932, and 934, respectively. The court-martial sentenced appellee to be…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. Martinez-SalazarSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  4. United States v. ColeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. ClaxtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. United States v. WiesenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  3. United States v. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  4. United States v. ClayCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  5. State v. HeathMontana Supreme Court · 2004

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API