Clevenger v. Smith
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCo Show, J.
By filing an amended answer after the demurrer to the further and separate defense in the original answer was sustained the original answer ceased to be a part of the pleadings. The pleadings, upon which the trial was conducted, are the complaint, the amended answer and the reply thereto. It is elementary law that in order to prove an illegal consideration the facts constituting the alleged illegality must be pleaded: 13 C. J. 742, §890; Wilson v. Prettyman, 94 Or. 275 (185 Pac. 587); Whitney v. Day, 86 Or. 268 (168 Pac. 295). The amended answer contains no facts tending to show failure of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Doon v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Newport Construction Co. v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Vnuk v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Whitney v. DayOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Wilson v. PrettymanOregon Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by4 opinions
- Howard-Cooper Corp. v. Umpqua Dredging & Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Baker v. JensenOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Baker v. JensenOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Sorenson v. BowenOregon Supreme Court · 1953