Legal Opinion

Howard-Cooper Corp. v. Umpqua Dredging & Construction Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

This action was instituted on the 7th day of February, 1932. It is based upon an account for material and labor. The itemized statement attached to and made a part of plaintiff’s complaint discloses a series of charges beginning with one dated January 8, 1930, and concluding with one dated January 28,1931. The charges total $9,600.53. The credits begin with one dated April 9, 1930, and end with one dated July 10, 1931, and total $6,383.73, leaving a balance of $3,216.80.

In a third amended answer defendant asserts a counterclaim for damages because of an alleged breach of warranty.

At the trial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wildman Mfg. Co. v. Davenport Hosiery MillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Marsh Wood Products Co. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Jamrog v. H. L. Handy Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Truslow Fulle, Inc. v. Diamond Bottling CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. Wells v. ApplegateOregon Supreme Court · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Western Feed Co. v. HeidloffOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Clarizo v. Spada Distributing Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. DeCicco v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1968
  4. Wagner Tractor, Inc. v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  5. Clarizo v. Spada Distributing Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API