Legal Opinion

Baker v. Jensen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

The power of a court to grant or refuse a continuance is a discretionary power which is to be exercised in a sound and legal manner and not arbitrarily or capriciously. It is not an unrestricted power, however, nor is it a decision upon matters within the absolute discretion of a court and, hence, not reviewable in courts of appeal. As was said by Mr. Justice Strahan in Mitchell v. Campbell, 14 Or. 454 (13 P. 190):

“In ordinary eases the court will not interfere with the discretion of the trial court in matters of practice before it. The law has wisely vested those courts with very large…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Ex parte JermanOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Mitchell v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Linn County v. MorrisOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Clevenger v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spaulding v. McCaigeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. Rickenbach v. FlavelOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Rodgers v. Nationwide InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API