Vnuk v. Patterson
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The plaintiff, aged twenty-eight years, seeks to recover damages from the defendant, who is thirty-nine years of age, for an'alleged breach of a mutual promise to marry each other. So far as disclosed by the record, the case is not in any sense or element one of seduction. Ill substance, the complaint is that during April, 1921, in Nebraska, the defendant, in consideration that plaintiff consented and agreed to marry him, promised and agreed to marry plaintiff within a reasonable time, not less than six months thereafter, which promise the plaintiff accepted, each of them being then and there…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McLennan v. McLennanOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Harpold v. DoyleIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Cooper v. BowerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Haviland v. . HalsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Jackson v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kugling v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- W. J. Seufert Land Co. v. GreenfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Sweinhart v. BambergerNew York Supreme Court · 1937
- In Re Estate of OttOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Jones v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.