Legal Opinion
Sorenson v. Bowen
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 1953PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
Plaintiff sued to foreclose a chattel mortgage securing a promissory note in the principal sum of $2,038.31 executed by defendant to plaintiff as payee.
Defendant, by answer, admitted execution of the note and mortgage, and that plaintiff was the lawful holder thereof and that no part of it had been paid. Affirmatively defendant pled:
“2. That said note and chattel mortgage were made and delivered by the defendant to the plaintiff in settlement of an accounting between plaintiff and defendant growing out of logging operations conducted by defendant for plaintiff, and based upon a computation…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Creecy v. JoyOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Morey v. LairdSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Bauer v. National Union Fire InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- National Surety Co. v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Hoyt v. ClarksonOregon Supreme Court · 1892
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Herring v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Herring v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994