Legal Opinion
Campanella v. Mason Tenders' District Council Pension Plan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 21, 2004No. 02 Civ.0032 VMPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Nicola and his brother Pietro Campanella (the “Campanellas”) are retired participants in the Mason Tenders’ District Council Pension Plan (the “Plan”). The Campanellas bring this action on their own behalf, and on behalf of all other Plan participants, against the Plan and the Board of Trustees of the Plan (the “Trustees” and collectively with the Plan, the “Defendants”) pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”). They allege numerous violations of ERISA by the Plan and the Trustees.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gloria Pagan v. Nynex Pension Plan and Nynex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Amara v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Cohen v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Lavigna v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010
- Mead v. Arthur Andersen, LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Nichols v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.