Legal Opinion

Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1981No. 79-1943PublishedCited by 1,040 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

Some private pension plans reduce a retiree’s pension benefits by the amount of workers’ compensation awards received subsequent to retirement. In these cases we consider whether two such offset provisions are lawful under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 88 Stat. 829, as amended, 29 U. S. C. § 1001 et seq. (1976 ed. and Supp. Ill), and whether they may be prohibited by state law.

I

Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., and General Motors Corp. maintain employee pension plans that are subject to federal regulation under ERISA. Both plans provide that an employee’s retirement…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,040 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

1,035 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API